EPA proposes mandated clean fuel rules
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday proposed new clean fuel rules to comply with a 2005 energy law that directs refiners and marketers to increase biofuel production from 4 billion gallons this year to 7.5 billion gallons in 2012.
Agency officials said a national "renewable fuels standard" would expand biodiesel and fuel ethanol use, create new markets for farm products, provide greater energy security, and reduce toxic pollution from cars.
"For years, our nation's rolling farm fields have filled America's breadbaskets. Now, by helping meet President Bush's renewable energy goals, these same fields are filling America's gas tanks," EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson said.
Specifically, EPA proposes 3.71 percent of all U.S. gasoline sold next year be a "renewable fuel." Currently the standard is 2.78 percent of all gasoline sales.
Most of the fuel ethanol made in the United States currently comes from corn, although the White House says it wants to devote government research dollars to other potential feedstocks, including waste paper and landfill trash. Biodiesel is typically made from soybeans.
EPA projected that the pending rules would mean that the nation's petroleum consumption would drop by 3.9 billion gallons per year, with 14 million tons in greenhouse gas emissions reduced annually.
Critics of the program, including some environmental groups, say ethanol fuels do little, if anything, to protect the public from harmful tailpipe emissions.
"Reducing oil imports is a good idea, but it should not come at the expense of reducing public health protections," said Frank O'Donnell, president of the advocacy group Clean Air Watch.
EPA's plan, still subject to public comment, also outlines a credit and trading system that the agency says would allow renewable fuels to be used where they are most economical, while giving fuel suppliers a flexible way to comply with the standard. Continued...
Monday, September 11, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment